The Great Balancing Act – Offense vs Defense in Chess

Offense vs Defense. In chess, which is better?

Should you focus heavily on the attack and capturing your opponent’s pieces? Or should you do everything to protect your pieces and let your offense be reactive?

Offense vs Defense in Chess

Pressuring your opponent with a consistent offensive attack improves your chances of a win, but ultimately a balance of offense and defense is best in chess.

Putting Consistent Pressure on Your Opponent

The short video above is a perfect example of how an aggressive offensive attack can literally leave your opponent with almost no options but to defend and react.

It’s narrated and explained really well so even a beginner player can understand.

One of the first things I noticed was how quickly white made their moves to control the center.

Controlling the center early really throws a wrench in your opponent’s offensive strategy. It can suddenly turn their entire game into defensively reacting.

Now this isn’t to say that you should be so aggressive that you’re bordering on reckless. This could easily cause a blunder for your opponent to take full advantage of.

You still have to carefully navigate your moves, avoid tunnel vision, and not rush anything.

Remember, rushing in chess is almost never a good thing. Sure, Bullet chess can be fun, but the mad rush is not good for your game.

Taking “the Initiative”


What does it mean to take the initiative in chess?

Taking the initiative means to be active and on the attack. A player taking the initiative in a game of chess is pressing the issue.

And what does this force the opponent to do? Think about it.

If your opponent is creating constant and calculated pressure on your pieces, you’re FORCED to respond and defend.

By playing aggressively, you force your opponent to focus on reacting to your moves, meaning they don’t have time to create offensive attacks.

But as we mentioned before, if you even make the slightest blunder, now the entire game flips and suddenly it’s you who are on the defensive.

So does this mean we need to play perfect and error free if we want to play with an aggressive offensive attack?

Don’t we already strive to play error free no matter if we’re playing offensively or defensively?

You see how it can actually all even out in the end. The focus doesn’t necessarily need to be on offense vs defense, but in minimizing your own errors.

Is There an Advantage to Sitting Back and Waiting for a Blunder?


So with this focus on not making any errors, could one then simply sit back defensively and focus on trying to play error free?

Would this continue to work the higher up the ranks you go?

Would a defensive minded game even work for you if your opponent is taking the inititiative with calculated and pressured attacks?

What happens when you’re the one who slips up?

Another user shares that he changes his tactics depending on his opponent.

I have to admit I’ve found myself doing this often.

If I’m playing someone ranked in the 1300s-1400s, I may feel that they are brand new to the game. I may play ultra aggressively putting pressure on them from the onset, feeling that even if I do make a mistake, it won’t cost me in the end.

And if I’m playing someone ranked in the 1700s? I tend to be constantly defending, understanding that this player is probably setting up his attacks several moves ahead.

And then there’s the flip side to this argument.

Many times beginners are the ones attacking wildly, without much of a plan.

They do everything they can to take pieces, and in doing so, often make blunders that instantly leave them in a bad position where the opponent can easily gain the advantage.

So maybe there’s something to playing defensively against a lesser rated opponent after all.

When it Comes to Offense vs Defense in Chess, Is It Even Our Choice?

There is an argument posed in the forums that when it comes to offense vs defense in chess, it’s rarely even our choice.

“Writers of articles on this site mentioned many times that choosing whether to play “aggressively” or “defensively” is almost never a choice you make. You have to play logical moves and avoid blunders first of all and the rest usually happens on its own.”

User Drawgood at

The blunder is the ultimate leveler of the playing field. And once it’s made, it’s all about how you recover.

Just like Mike Tyson said, “Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the mouth.”

Again though, if you take the initiative and press the issue attacking your opponent, you likely take control at least early in the game, right?

Chess Ultimately Comes Down to Balance


You really can’t focus on JUST offense or JUST defense.

Why? Because like most every game out there, it’s built on balance.

Think about playing basketball and having ZERO defense. Think about any team that’s ever won the Super Bowl. Think about any baseball team that’s won the World Series.

They all had balance between star players and role players along with a balance between offense and defense.

Offense and defense are the yin to each other’s yang. If you play purely offensively, you leave yourself open to attack.

Similarly, if you play purely defensively you won’t have taken advantage of any of your opponent’s missteps.

You have to be an adaptive player to consistently win at chess.

Final Thoughts

Take the initiative, control the center, but do so in a controlled manner. Maintain a balance with your defense, and commit the fewest blunders.

What kind of player are you? Are you the aggressive offensive player putting pressure on your opponent?

Or do you sit back and play defensively, waiting for your opponent to commit a blunder that you can then take advantage of?

Does your offensive and defensive style change depending on your opponent?

Let me know how you feel in the comments section below! I love reading your questions and comments and I always reply back.

16 thoughts on “The Great Balancing Act – Offense vs Defense in Chess”

  1. I used to love my young days playing chess with my grandpaw. We would sit outside with a fresh homemade glass of sweet tea on Sundays. I actually found that the most effective strategy was not offensive nor defense, but control. I never actively thought about taking pieces or protecting mine. My main goal was always to stay one step ahead of my opponent and that seemed to always work. 

  2. It’s funny that you talk about strategies in chess. I used to talk to a chess player who told me that defensive strategy is the best because that was the style where you could anticipate your adversary’s moves. But when I read your article, your advice makes more sense. Indeed, you can’t always be defensive. You must adapt your strategy to the current game.

    • Agreed. I find myself playing defense against better players and ultimately never giving myself a chance to attack. Balance is HUGE, and by leaning towards offense I feel you can put some better pressure on your opponent and hopefully cause a blunder. Thanks for the comment!

  3. Although I haven´t played in a while, my method of playing involved trying my darndest to control the middle. There are times when you have to attack and other times when you feed off the reaction of your opponent.

    I admire those chess players who compete or those in clubs. Chess can be a good way to relax and have fun with friends and family.

  4. “The best defense is an attack”- valid in a real war. In this battle of the mind – chess – defense is a very good strategy when you don’t know your opponent. It is more cautious to wait for the opponent’s moves, in this way you can “feel” him. Is he in a hurry? does he think he’s in control? what sacrifices is he willing to make? 

    Each game played is unique. The strategy used depends on the opponents. I think that those who play a lot alternately apply the method of attack and defense. 

  5. I don’t know why I decided to get back into chess, but very happy I did. These days I play more and read a lot about chess; I like this game, it’s so funny and trains our brain; I think it helps us to have the most brilliant mind, all the offenses or defenses are essential to us, for winning we have to be smart.

  6. Balance is the key factor in my opinion. I remember when we used to set around family table and playing it. offensive steps could lead to be attacked by your opponent. I think this game improve our brain concentration skills.
    Thank you for this article,

  7. Hi Eric,

    I like how you take your reader through the different phases of playing the game.  I like that you mentioned that Chess is really focused on balance.

    This post also lends way for a reflective moment, as in my opinion, chess is real life being played out in a game.  What I personally take from it is humility.  Never underestimate the intelligence of someone whether we think they are experienced or not.

    I thank you for this amazing post and wish you continued success.


  8. Awesome article, I’m enjoying going through the site here, learning a lot man!

    I think a major setback for me is that I want to try to focus SOLELY on offense, offense, offense… Almost putting any idea of balance completely out of the picture. It’s for sure how I first started learning, just ATTACK at all times and hope for the best basically… 😅

    I’ll continue trying my best to take initiative, so I know I’m doing that right, but I need to dial in some more on overall balance depending on how the match plays out…

    Another great post! 👍 👍

    • It’s all about balance! I like focusing on defense sometimes and then keying in on how my opponents attack against it, then I use those attacks myself in other games.


Leave a Comment